Thursday morning, we made our way in small groups to the V&A Museum to meet our professor at 10:15. I wasn't so psyched about waking up early for a place that's a bit of a ways, but this is a class, so we did. I didn't even know what the Museum was going to be about, so I tried to keep an open mind because the British Museum turned out to be so awesome. Unfortunately, this one didn't turn out to be so awesome. Instead of taking off to see everything, my two friends and I went to grab lunch at the cafe. Can I just say: the Coke in London is the best pop I've ever had in my life. It's not just pop - it's sparkling soft drink with vegetable extracts, no added preservatives, and no artificial flavours. WHAT? Anyways, there was a theatre gallery, in which Erica, Courtney, and I played dress up, which was absolutely hilarious.
*
Billy Elliot
The playwright is trying to convey the theme of being yourself, and that you have one life and doing what makes you happy, no matter who chooses to support you or not support you, you have to do what makes you happy. The show did a fabulous job of getting this point across, and this show was definitely worth doing. We had great seats for the show, but honestly, I don’t think there could’ve been a bad seat in the house. However, I couldn’t see the orchestra pit, so I thought that the music was recorded the whole time (because it was that flawless). But although the play was poignant, I didn’t feel an intimacy or closeness with the performance. The theatre was large, and seemed like a newer theatre, so the sound wasn’t great. There was too much electrical amplification, but this might be due to the fact that the acoustics of the theatre weren’t great, or that the cast included children that might not have the ability to project their voices for the whole theatre. There was plenty of legroom, so I was physically comfortable. The only distracting thing was the person beside me sat up in my view range and was curling their hair with their fingers incessantly. The structure was a traditional linear plot. I was definitely affected emotionally, as was the entire audience. When Billy and his mother (or mother’s ghost) sang to each other, I was on the verge of tears, and left the theatre with a lump in my throat. And the music and choreography of Billy’s dancing left me with a feeling of inspiration and awe. Every actor portrayed their character almost perfectly; the father made me feel uncomfortable with his anger and lack of support and Michael made me laugh with his naïve and childish ways and mannerisms. I thought that each actor had strong, successful performances, but the three performers who stood out to me were Billy, Michael, and the dance teacher. They were all successful in portraying what they needed to portray, but my favorite character was Michael. I don’t think that the actors had much control over whose performance was more dynamic versus mediocre. (Of course, they do have control over how well or not well they performed). But in this case, if one had a main role, they were the dynamic characters. The casting in the show seemed to be traditional - no odd balls sticking out. In this case, spectacle was not used to cover up flaws. When Billy rose into the hair (hanging by a line) and was spinning, it was more a metaphor for his life and him growing. It was not a mere distraction while others were doing shenanigans. I’m sure in Aristotle’s time, he was correct about spectacle, but in 2010, there are things called lighting and drop curtains, and spectacle doesn’t need to be used to distract the audience from seeing flaws. Shows nowadays aren’t magic shows, they’re performances. I thought the scenery and music design was most impactful. The scenery was realistic and detailed enough to look believable, but not overwhelming. The music, more the lyrics than the actual instrumental accompaniment, impacted me the most, making the show more of a tearjerker than I expected. However, the choreography was absolutely brilliant, with Michael’s dances evoking laughter and comedic relief, and Billy’s inspiring and absolutely stunning routines. I couldn’t believe such a young person could dance like that. It made me question, is someone groomed for a role like that, or do they show up at a casting call and fit the role and then learn to do that? I also liked the costume design. The dance teachers hair, makeup, and costume design were all fabulous and stylish. But I did think that sound design was done poorly, and was way too loud for my overall enjoyment. The design of the production most definitely supported the meaning and intent of the play, but if more had been added, it would have started to take away from the actual performance. I thought things were nicely done, and just enough was done. The one thing that impacted me about the play was the love that was shared during Billy’s songs with his mother. It was so nice to see that he had a fan, even though she wasn’t even alive.
*
After the show, everyone was exhausted. Erica and I tried to walk quickly. We made it to the tube, and the two piercing pains in my belly that seemed to shoot from my front to my back, had me doubled over in the tube station. Luckily, we made it home, and turns out, a little ibuprofen and a Hershey's bar is a cure-all. Although I was tired, I stayed up to get to talk to my Bradders for the first time since I've been here. (Completely worth it, by the way). Then it was off to bed.
Friday:
Another early morning. We had to travel Westminster again to meet the group. We were taking an hour-long river cruise from Westminster to Greenwich (pronounced by the Brits as "green itch").
So we decided to make our way home. At one of the stations before Westminter (Victoria?) we saw a photo booth for passport pictures. We had to get our picture taken. So the three of us cram into this tiny one-stool booth and cheese. The stupid thing wouldn't take our picture. Finally it went, after telling us our pose was not an approved passport picture, and then finally it printed. But anways - Turns out - the theatre isn't in the theatre district. So we got back on the tube and made our way to Battersea Arts Centre on Lavender Hill. This place was like the Harlem of London, at least from what I can tell. We got to the theatre, got our tickets, ran to Subway for a light dinner, then back to the theatre. We saw 1984, the show i was most excited about. turns out - i was wrong. it was absolutely horrible, and i don't mean kind of crappy like Twelfth Night, I mean absolutely horrible. I was trying to convince my friends to read the book and not make an opinion of it based on the play. HORRIBLE. So, at the interval, Erica went outside with me while I smoked a cigarette. While we were standing there I felt a whiz by my calf, and we both heard a THUMP. then another one. we look down and there are two oranges. then there are these two kids, and one goes "Quit smoking it's naughty!" I looked at Erica, both of our mouths open in shock, and then... the kids came and picked up the oranges.
*
1984
The playwright is trying to tell the story of the novel of 1984, and depict the ideas of the Big Brother, mind control, surveillance, and a life with no choices or privacy. The play depicted all of these things, but was not what I expected. I expected the play to be more of the story of Winston, his inner struggles and personal experiences, which the play touched on, but I felt like the play was just a mere summary of the novel. Was it worth doing? I still don’t know. I absolutely hated the story they chose to depict, so I would say no. But artistically, I thought it was different, so I would say no. I’m torn, it’s something I personally could have lived without, but I’m glad they’re trying to get the story and reality of Big Brother out to the public. I sat at the very top of the seats, which I think was helpful because I could see everything, whereas the people in front couldn’t see or catch some of the signs up close. But, I could see between the cracks of the barricades and could see if they were preparing to hold up props or hiding. Unlike everyone else who was sitting on benches, the back row had chairs at least. I found the theatre to be bleak and small, almost like a prison cell, but that could be the feel they intended on seeing as the story had a lot to do with imprisonment. The play had a minimalist style, and that theme was brought to life by the costumes, properties, theatre, scenery, and sounds. I wish I had been a little closer to the stage merely so I could have seen the details of the puppets better, but I was impressed that even though the puppets were small, I could still see them and understand them. This play had a traditional linear structure; it started, told a story from beginning to end, and then ended. I was manipulated intellectually, and even though I didn’t enjoy the performance, I was manipulated emotionally. The fact that I was agitated the entire time seems to me like a manipulation of my emotions. The eight-bit music was annoying, the never-ending signs got old and corny, and the girl playing the old man (who NEVER quit squenching her face, even when she wasn’t being that character) got under my skin like nothing else. For the style of play, I thought that all of the actors did a fine job. Winston was most successful, as he annoyed me less than all of the others. He seemed the most human of all, considering the people he was around were like little robots in their socialist government. But overall, I didn’t find any of the performances dynamic or anything to swoon over. The casting was traditional. In fact, all of the actors (with the exception of Winston and his chest hair that covered his neck) looked the same: white skinned and average. Other than the digital music and overuse of props, there wasn’t any spectacle in this performance. They didn’t need any, not for the story they chose to convey. However, in a larger venue, they would’ve need something more than annoying sounds and signs to keep anyone from getting up and walking out. The bland costumes and colors had an impact on me, most definitely. Other than being annoyed, I was not emotionally impacted. I deeply disliked the sound design, set design, and lack of scenery, but I really liked the puppet designs. Above all, the design of the production most definitely supported the intent and meaning of this show. It was minimalist, bare, and almost unbearable. The one thing that most impacted me was the audience. The people in front of me laughed at everything, which I found the play to not contain funny themes or actions. They laughed at Winston fucking Julia, which was so over-the-top to show how bad they wanted to just have sex, not to be funny, and laughed at Winston being electrocuted, which I guess if you find people being shocked and then screaming with their hands out because of the pain funny, then this play is right up your alley. I felt that this performance tried really hard to depict what the novel was about, but lacked depth, and the audience just wasn’t ready to think critically instead of laughing and looking at what was right in front of their faces.
*
Finally, that sorry excuse for a play was over, and Erica, Eric, and I took off (trying to escape the group too). We practically ran to the Tube station, only for there to be technical difficulties with Eric's oyster card. But we managed to get on the train with only 2 other people from the group also making it. We returned to the flat to get dressed. We were going to Fabric. After getting cute and freshening up our scent and make up, we headed out. And we saw the line. The line for Fabric. So we stopped at a pub to get a drink while the line was so long. There, we met three people from Paris: Carrie, Julian, and some girl who's name sounded like a Jewish expression and I couldn't pronounce, let alone spell. It was nice, they liked Americans, they called Paris magical, and they were funny. It was nice - I'd kind of given up on Paris and going. I figured they all hated us Americans and I wasn't so sure about Paris. But they changed my mind, and my hope has been restored! So we all got in line for the club, but the two French girls got separated, so just the Americans got in when we got to the entrance. I can't even put this place into words. Not only was it huge (3, 4 floors?) The music was awesome. You walk into this place, and the bass vibrates through your whole body. It was hot, so we checked our coats (one pound) and went to dance. There were several djs, one for each floor, but i think the one we stayed at longest was Numbers. I don't know check out for the details. So we dance and dance and dance and have an absolute ball. At about 3 I went out for a smoke, and met George, who goes to university at Bath. He LOVED my tattoos. In fact, he said "That looks like some Miami Ink shit right there" and taught me something about swallows. He saw Holly Golightly on my right inner arm, and asked where my second swallow was. I told him I didn't have one. He said you're supposed to get your second swallow when you're on the path that you want to be on in life, and you're happy with where you're headed. Swallows, I learned, mate for life, so they're lovebirds. So I go back in and we all decide that it's about time to go. I had noticed the shirts that the staff were wearing, almost like I <3 NY but it was I

Recently named the best club in the world (again) by DJmag, Fabric is a club that is universally acknowledged as being the best at what it does because it simply focuses on the heart of club culture: the music. Although Fabric has been graced by the presence of top DJs, it is most widely celebrated for bringing underground dance music and more obscure, but still talented DJs to the spotlight. Fabric was also the first club in Europe to house what it calls a “bodysonic” dancefloor: clubbers on the dancefloor can literally shake it to the beat because parts of the floor are hooked up to 400 bass transducers that pump out the music being played, right into the dancing bodies via their feet. With 25000 square feet of room to get shook in a club in which “there’s never been so much as a dud DJ,” Fabric more than deserves a spot in this list.
Saturday:
Erica and I planned on waking up at 11. At 2, we got out of bed, got dressed, and headed out to run errands. Turns out, everything is closed on Saturday. The weather was miserable, the post office was closed (I HAVE to get these postcards in the mail!), the banks were closed, and even most of the pubs were closed. We found a cute place to grab some lunch then headed home, as it was almost time for me to start my adventure to the concert tonight. On the way home, we stopped to buy groceries. (Yeah, we're a little tired of spending the money to eat out all the time, and dang, it adds up!) So we get home after grocery shopping, and lo and behold, a bag of my groceries was missing. So I get dressed for the concert, and sweet Erica says she'll walk with me to the grocery store and bring my bag back, as it's on my way to the concert. So we go, they have it, she takes it, and I'm off on my own. I went to Holborn and took the Central Line to the Picadilly Line and got off at Leicester Station, which is right at Trafalgar Square, which is where St. Martin-in-the-Fields is located.
And now that I have internet on MY computer, I'll be able to update everyday.
And can I just say, so many people said the food would be horrible in London - and I would like to take a moment and say WTF? It's delicious. The veggies are crisp, the fruit is flavorful, and most importantly, things aren't genetically modified. So yeah, there are some shitty fish'n'chips places that don't beer-batter them or whatever, but c'mon, even Subway has fresh ingredients that are better than the US's. So yeah - next time you're in London, if you've had a bad experience, FIND BETTER PLACES and don't be such a tourist.
Cheers!
No comments:
Post a Comment